Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri

Take Action

Invest in Kids Initiatve

NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri and NARAL Pro-Choice America Join in Letter of Protest of Proposed HHS Rule that Would Hurt Women

Invest in Kids Campaign

» more action alerts

Choice Headlines

8/27/2008
HPV Vaccine Project

7/30/2008
SIECUS Report on Kentucky's Abstinence-Only-Until-Marriage Programs

6/17/2008
"Pro-Life Drugstores Market Beliefs"

» more choice headlines

Press Releases

6/30/2008
NARAL endorses Rep. Robin Wright-Jones

5/21/2008
Pro-Choice victory is good news for Missouri women

5/14/2008
Statement of NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri about NARAL Pro-Choice America’s Endorsement of Barack Obama for President of the United States

» more press releases

Science & Women’s Health

Opposition to the right to choose has had an adverse and chilling impact on scientific research and medical advances in the United States.

In recent decades, anti-choice political activity has interfered with promising research into a host of diseases and conditions, including Parkinson's, cancer, AIDS, endometriosis, infertility, and multiple sclerosis. Research on fetal tissue played an instrumental role in the development of the polio vaccine, virtually eliminating the disease from our society. Yet those who oppose abortion still seek to halt this research at every turn.

In addition to blocking scientific advancement, anti-choice groups often turn science on its head in their effort to portray legal abortion as unsafe for American women. In reality, legal abortion is one of the safest and most common medical procedures available today. Legal abortion entails half the risk of death involved in a tonsillectomy and one-hundredth the risk of death involved in an appendectomy. The risk of death from legal abortion is even lower than that from a shot of penicillin. And although anti-choice groups often try to link abortion with the risk of developing breast cancer, the largest and most comprehensive study on the subject concluded that "induced abortions have no overall effect on the risk of breast cancer."

Anti-choice lawmakers must not be allowed to stand in the way of scientific progress. And women must be given the proven facts about abortion, not misinformation designed to frighten them and prevent them from exercising their constitutional right to choose.
A LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS OF S.B. 766
A LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS OF S.B. 766 (fetal personhood/fetal endangerment via pregnant woman’s drug or alcohol use)[1]
Abortion opponents are distorting scientific data to advance their agenda.
Despite a lack of evidence associating abortion with an increased risk of breast cancer, anti-choice groups are distorting scientific data ...

Home | Take Action | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us
Pregnant? Need Help? | Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri

©NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri