Contact Us Donate Site Guide
NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri
Print
NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri

Take Action

Call on CBS to Drop Focus on the Family Super Bowl Ad

Stop Abortion Coverage Ban

A Bittersweet Birthday for EC Access

» more action alerts

Choice Headlines

1/29/2010
Man Convicted of Murdering Kansas Abortion Provider

1/29/2010
A Tough Case to Make at the Tiller Murder Trial

1/27/2010
CBS Urged to Cancel Focus on the Family Super Bowl Ad

» more choice headlines

Press Releases

3/17/2010
House Democrats block unconstitutional bait and switch

1/20/2010
Who Decides: 2010

» more press releases

Young Women’s Rights

Responsible parents should be involved when their young daughters face a crisis pregnancy. Indeed, every parent hopes that a child confronting a crisis pregnancy will seek the advice and counsel of those who care for her most and know her best. And even in the absence of laws mandating parental involvement, many young women do turn to their parents when they are considering an abortion.

Yet, some young women cannot involve their parents because they come from homes where physical violence or emotional abuse are prevalent or because their pregnancies are the result of incest. Put simply, the government cannot mandate healthy family communication where it does not already exist and there is no law that can account for every situation that a young woman in crisis may face.

But unfortunately, young women in crisis are becoming an increasingly inviting target for restrictive legislation. In the states, laws mandating parental involvement in a minor's decision about abortion are becoming all too common, even when the pregnancy is the result of incest or news of the minor's pregnancy may result in emotional or physical abuse.

In Congress, anti-choice lawmakers are seeking to restrict minors access to reproductive health care services with legislation like the Child Custody Protection Act. This dangerous bill would make it a crime for anyone other than a woman's parents, including a grandparent, aunt, or older sibling, to take her across state lines for an abortion if doing so would violate her home state's parental involvement requirements. Even the confidentiality of minors' medical records and the services minors receive have been the target of anti-choice attempts to restrict reproductive freedom.

Minors do not vote. They have virtually no political power. Consequently, they represent a safe target for anti-choice lawmakers bent on restricting reproductive freedom for all American women. And too often it is the minor who pays the price.
Analysis of H.R. 212 (anti-FOCA nonbinding Resolution)
ANALYSIS OF H.R. 212 (anti-FOCA nonbinding Resolution)[1][1] By Pamela L. Sumners, Esq., Executive Director The antiquated constitutional philosophy that animates ...
A Legislative Analysis of H.B. 1316
 A Legislative Analysis of H.B. 1316[1]
Ability to Travel Being Targeted by Anti-Choice Legislators
 Information on the "Child Custody Protection Act" (CCPA) and Teen Endangerment (SB 34) legislation.The "Child Custody Protection Act" (CCPA) would ...

Home | Take Action | Issues | In Our State | News | About Us | Support Us
Pregnant? Need Help? | Contact Us | Get E-mail Alerts | Privacy Policy

©NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri

©NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri